Advertisement

EU and UK plan to postpone electric vehicle tariffs

auto.pub Charging station 22.05.25
Fullscreen image

The European Union and the UK are considering postponing a planned 10% tariff on electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids. Stricter rules of origin are due to restrict tariff-free vehicle trade from January 2027, but Europe’s battery industry has been unable to expand production capacity quickly enough. Carmakers estimate that the new requirements could leave the sector facing around €1.5 billion in additional costs as early as next year.

Advertisement

European battery factories cannot keep pace with demand

According to the Financial Times, the European Commission is discussing with carmakers the possibility of delaying the new rules of origin by one or two years. The UK government also supports a postponement, but no final agreement has yet been reached.

The problem stems from the post-Brexit trade agreement. Under its terms, electric vehicles must meet specific regional content requirements to qualify for tariff-free trade between the EU and the UK.

From 1 January 2027, at least 55% of a vehicle’s value must originate in the EU or the UK. The regional content requirement will rise to 65% for battery cells and modules, and to 70% for battery packs.

Vehicles that do not meet the requirements would face a 10% tariff.

However, the development of Europe’s battery industry has fallen short of forecasts. Several planned battery factories have yet to begin production, and carmakers still depend on cells imported from China, Japan and South Korea.

Carmakers face €1.5 billion in additional costs

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, ACEA, estimates that EU manufacturers will export around 520,000 electric cars and vans to the UK in 2027, with a total value of €17.9 billion.

With current supply chains, around 82% of those vehicles would not meet the stricter rules of origin.

That would mean approximately €1.47 billion in additional tariff costs for carmakers in a single year.

The additional burden would affect trade in both directions. For example, the UK-built Nissan Leaf and Stellantis electric commercial vehicles compete with locally manufactured models in the European market.

The tariff would make pricing those vehicles more difficult, and some of the cost could be passed on to consumers.

Brussels considers a shorter transition period

Carmakers want to retain the current rules of origin for battery packs until the end of 2029, apply stricter requirements for battery cells from 2030 and postpone origin restrictions on cathode materials until 2032.

Advertisement

The European Commission is considering more limited changes. One option is a one-year delay; another is a two-year special arrangement that would allow manufacturers to offset the share of non-compliant vehicle exports against sales of vehicles that meet the regional content requirements.

This is not the first concession. The same stricter rules were originally due to take effect in 2024, but the EU and the UK extended the transition period until the end of 2026.

Further negotiations are expected after the EU–UK summit on 20 November.

A delay would help carmakers but would not resolve dependence on China

Postponing the tariff would give European manufacturers time to develop the local battery industry and avoid potential increases in electric vehicle prices.

Yet there is a contradiction in such a decision. The purpose of the rules of origin is precisely to encourage European production of batteries and their components. Repeatedly postponing the requirements could reduce the pressure to invest in local factories.

European battery companies do not necessarily support easing the requirements either, as this could reduce returns on investments already made.

For Chinese carmakers, by contrast, the situation is favourable. If European manufacturers have to pay additional tariffs because of their own supply chains, their Chinese competitors become relatively more attractive in the UK market.

The real problem for Europe’s automotive industry is therefore not the 10% tariff, but its inability to establish a competitive battery industry quickly enough. An additional transition period could help prevent price increases, but without new investment and production capacity, carmakers will face the same question again in a few years.

The direct impact on buyers depends on which models’ prices and supply chains would change as a result of the possible tariff. For now, there is no basis for saying that prices will definitely rise, as negotiations are still under way.